<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ATOMICSHED &#187; thoughts design css jquery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.atomicshed.com/index.php/tag/thoughts-design-css-jquery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.atomicshed.com</link>
	<description>The ATOMICSHED blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:25:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>flexible positioning</title>
		<link>http://blog.atomicshed.com/index.php/design/flexible-positioning/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.atomicshed.com/index.php/design/flexible-positioning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 11:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interactive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thoughts design css jquery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.atomicshed.com/?p=793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nope not talking yoga here. Been thinking about why webpages in particular aren&#8217;t flexible or intelligent enough to change layout depending on how the user configures their browser. For example say I view a site on an iPhone in vertical mode, horizontal navigation might be better than vertical (in a column) but what if I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.atomicshed.com/index.php/design/flexible-positioning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

